Comparing Griswold Vs. Connecticut - 1647 Words

Griswold vs Connecticut Madison Hayworth Clovis Community College November 25, 2015 Often times in today’s world we take certain luxuries for granted. The right to vote, the right of free speech, etc. But one of those luxuries that people often don’t consider is the right for women to use birth control. The Supreme Court case that argued for the use of contraceptives was Griswold vs Connecticut. The court case was argued March 29th-30th 1965, but was not decided until June 7th 1965. The case was on the debate of whether or not the use of contraceptives should be legalized. Griswold, the Executive and Medical Director of Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, was on the side arguing for the legalization of the use of contraceptives in a marriage. While the opposing side, the state of Connecticut statute, had forbidden the use of contraceptives since 1879. The Appellant, Estelle Griswold, had been counseling married couples at the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, located in New Haven. The counseling aimed to give them medical advice as well as information about different types of contraceptives, such as devices or drugs. Ms. Griswold would meet with married couples and discuss which form of contraception was the right fit for the patient. Due to the fact that these actions broke a Connecticut law that criminalized counseling about birth control, Griswold and one of her colleagues were both found guilty. Nine days after the PlannedShow MoreRelatedShould Abortion Be Legal Or Illegal? Essay1885 Words   |  8 Pagesand cervical cancer and even death (History, 2016). Before abortion was legal U.S. women were able to end a pregnancy prior to viability with the assistance of medical personnel, from the 18th and the 19th century with no issues or problems. Connecticut law followed the 1829 New York law, which restricted abortion and tries to punish women who seek information about abortion. The first US federal law on the subject was the Comstock Law of 1873, permitted a special agent of the postal service to